Tongues necessary evidence?
I was reading through this months Pentacostel Evangel this morning, and ran across an article entitled Tongues: The necessary evidence. It’s not available online, yet just about any local AOG church should have it. It’s not worth the effort though. The article boils down to this: Acts 10 & 11 demonstrate that tongues are the necessary evidence of the filling of the Holy Spirit.
Well, the AoG church I attend, thankfully, does not promote this unscriptural doctrine. The downside of attending an AoG church with more scriptural grounding is that sometimes you forget that the denomination as a whole does still hold to such things. I wrote a rough draft response to this article this afternoon, and then went to check out their submission guidelines. There’s no way they’ll ever publish this. ;-) Not that I would expect them to. It would be unreasonable to expect them to use their magazine to provide a forum for views that disagree with theirs. This is the soft of thing that has to be handled in other ways.
So, I decided to post my response online instead. If you’re curious about my thoughts on the issue, take a look. I welcome your comments.
